Skip to main content
User manualDeveloper documentation
TopologiesUse casesFAQs

31. Achieve constant memory in hydra-node

· 2 min read
Sasha Bogicevic
Sasha Bogicevic
Senior Software Engineer

Status​

Accepted

Context​

When testing out hydra-node operation under heavy or increased load we are noticing that memory consumption is far from ideal. So far we didn't bother thinking about the performance so much but time has come to try and reduce memory footprint of a running hydra-node.

There are some quick points to be scored here since our projections that are used to serve in-memory data are using a common haskell list as a data structure. We should stream the data keeping the memory bounded as the first optimisation.

It is also not necesary to output the whole history of messages by default and only do that if clients request to see the whole history. Internally our ServerOutput type could be remapped to StateChanged since the two are almost identical. Any new information must be streamed to the clients automatically.

Decision​

  • Re-map ServerOutput to StateChanged by adding any missing constructor to StateChanged (eg. PeerConnected).
  • Output new client messages on newState changes instead of using ClientEffect.
  • Use StateChanged in all projections we server from the API (re-use eventId as sequence number).
  • Make hydra-node output history of messages only on demand (breaking change is to be communicated in the changelog).
  • Use conduit library to achieve constant memory by streaming the data in our projections.

Consequences​

This should lead to much better performance of hydra-node in terms of used memory for the running process. This should be also confirmed by running the relevant benchmarks and do a test (even manual or a script) to assert that the memory consumption is actually reduced.